U203-A Display

U203-A Display

Features:

6 digits volume,6 digits sales,4 digits price per unit

Big LCD screen and bright backlight

running normally on the condition of -40 C to 55 C

Current:500mA

Weight:300g

100% Factory Tested.

lled to fasten card in case of preventing pull out. Keyboard is commonly used by reader and fuel dispenser. Filling operation command firstly is received by reader, and transmitted into fuel dispenser through port I. Printer is optional. So, most IC card fuel dispenser isn’t mounted it. RF antenna is preset for adopting radio frequency card. By structure, there are no much differences between fuel dispenser’s IC card and the POS of commercial IC card. IC card fuel dispenser has many functions such as card read-write operation, data processing, safety attestation, data memory and management, keybo fuel dispenser ard operation, graphic fuel dispenser display, exchange data with main board and with fuel management system, power supply management, etc. in order to integrate all above operations, some manufacturers adopt several single-chip. 5.2 Card-linkage technology Control type of fuel dispenser Fuel dispenser is divided into filling controlled type and filing uncontrolled type in terms of filling process. True mechanical fuel dispenser and electronic fuel dispenser with electronic count function don’t have function of controlling filling. Computerized fuel dispenser basically is designed to be controllable type with two kinds of modes ---- collective control and disperse control. Collective control type is adopted manageable device to control fuel dispenser though command. Disperse control type, according to identifying user’s information, realizes operation of fuel dispenser by the device installed on fuel dispenser that identify IC card or other label carrier. Ac fuel dispenser cording to different control type and employ mode, there are several operation methods: Indoor / outdoor filling Indoor filling: need authorized command sent by manageable device to open pump after holding up nozzle. Outdoor filling: needn’t authorized command sent by manageable device to open pump after holding up nozzle. Auto / non-auto authorized filling Auto authorized filling: manageable device automatically, after holding nozzle, transmit

................................ 71　　 12.3.2.2. Contr 磍e(s) de codes ............................................................................................................ 72　　 12.3.2.3. Gestion du mode de paiement (comptant cr dit comptant diff r ) ................................... 72　　 12.4. ASPECTS COMMUNS A TOUS LES APPLICATIFS .......................................................................... 72　　 12.4.1. Param trage .................................................................................................................... 72　 fuel dispenser 　 12.4.2. Transact fuel dispenser ion ...................................................................................................................... 73　　 12.4.2.1. Gestion dune session transaction........................................................................................ 73　　 12.4.2.2. Ouverture dune session transaction .................................................................................... 73　　 12.4.2.3. Gestion des demandes dautorisation .................................................................................. 73　　 12.4.2.4. Formatage et impression du ticket porteur (client) ............................................................... 74　　 12.4.2.5. Cl 磘ure dune session transaction ........................................................................................ 75　　 12.5. ECHANGES DE SERVICE ................................ fuel dispenser ....................................................................... 76　　 12.5.1. Mise en place des canaux ............................................................................................... 76　　13. DICTIONNAIRE DES DONNEES ................................................................................................ 77　　 13.1. PRESENTATION ...........................................................

hteen months later, the rate edged up to £3.70. At this level it was worth only 36% of average hourly earnings for all employees. Furthermore, workers aged 18 to 21 had a separate, lower rate, which began at £3 in 1999 and was raised to £3.20 in October 2000. The modest starting point for the minimum wage meant that it affected relatively few workers. The commission initially thought that it would raise the pay of around 2m workers but in practice only about a million gained. This limited any possible loss of jobs. After the initial period of caution, however, the government got bolder. This mont fuel dispenser h s increase pushed the fuel dispenser main rate up by 6%, comfortably ahead of average earnings which went up by 4.4% in the past year. Since 1999 the minimum wage has risen by 49%, outstripping average earnings which increased by 32% in the past seven years (see chart). As a result, it is now worth 41% of average hourly earnings. This trajectory contrasts sharply with what has happened in America. The federal minimum wage has stayed at $5.15 since September 1997. At this level, it is worth 27% of average hourly wages for all employees other than those working in agriculture or for the federal government—far stingier than Britain s rate. The commission accepts that the period when the minimum wage rose faster than average earnings is over. The worry, however, is that it has already risen to a level that will hurt employment. The Confederation of British Industry said on September 24th that businesses in several parts of the economy, such as retailing fuel dispenser , were struggling to cope with the minimum wage. A few days later the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) added that the latest increase would have “serious implications�?for firms. David Kern, who advises the BCC, says “There is now a distinct risk that the minimum wage will have an adverse effect on jobs.�? Whether employment will necessarily take a big knock is uncertain. Mainstream economic theory suggests that a minimum wage set too hig