P-G22Q FUEL DISPENSER

P-G22Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm): Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V): 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter): Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose: 4.5m

Weight : 235kg

Dimension(L×W×H) :1060*550*1620(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container :40ft: 44 20ft: 22

f the technological supervision department. Appraisal result would be affected by these elements including subjective operation fuel dispenser and technique, different testing environment, etc. which poss fuel dispenser ibly result in additional error.Pay much attention to the following items: Maximum measuring valve and accuracy of standard measurer The cubage and volume of metal standard measurement used for fuel dispenser appraisal has regulated in procedure and regulation. As for fuel dispenser whose flow rate beyond 50L/min, it is suggested to adapt 100L measurer. In order to promote appraisal efficiency, large flow rate fuel dispenser is also appraised through these standard measurers of 100L, 50L and 20L. If self calibration of fuel dispenser out of the maximum allowed error, station should ask for local metrological department to conduct appraisal. Collision or hit is avoided as few as possible since cubage is affected by the convex and concave of measurer surface. Vernier of measurer is fixed on measuring neck. Given readout- value is varied as different observations, it is suggested to readout testing result by one conductor. Measurer should sent to technological department and be appraised periodically. Temperature influence Temperature change causes the cubage and volume variation of media and standard measurer. Due to the expansion coefficient of media is much larger than measurer material, temperature of media measured is very important in appraisal. 1 fuel dispenser �errand would lead to 0.1% relative cubage error. Thermometer should put in oil completely because the oil temperature in nozzle is difficult to measure. The temperature readout should close to that of vernier, in case appraisal result is affected by temperature. Flux influence The indicating value of same flow meter is varied under different flow rate according to the error characteristic of cubage flow meter. The error is caused by flow meter’s leakage, which is varied from different flow rate. Thereby, openness of nozzle should keep stable in appraisal progress

Cod en ASCII　　 Date-mois fuel dispenser 8　　AAMM DM fuel dispenser 4　　 Cod en ASCII　　 Date-jour 9　　MMJJ DJ 4　　 Bool en= 0 ou 1　　(sans objet) 10 1　　 B 1　　 Type num r : 0..255　　(sans objet) 11 1 3　　 E 1　　 Donn e brute non cod e 0 2　　 -　　 Objet compos　　 OC　 fuel dispenser 　 All right reserved � Imprim le 210203 13:02 50138　　 MPA V5.2: SPECIFICATIONS Ref : NT1118R5　　 TECHNIQUES Nb Pages : 138 + 0 PJ　　 de la LIAISON AUTOMATE-MONETIQUE Date :　　POS Department　　Note 1: la plupart des donn es dont le format nest pas explicitement d f

rate charged to refinance existing contracts. New agreements that let the state share in the gains from refinancing may lead to fuel dispenser additional savings. On balance, PFI deals seem to work bes fuel dispenser t on projects where the government needs something simple and easily measured, says Deloitte, an accounting firm. Asking for a school with a roof that doesn t leak is a good example. But risk is difficult to price, and costs go up as it is added. That is a worry for military PFI deals pricing the risk of war into a contract would be an impressive feat of economic forecasting. Another problem is that the government must sacrifice flexibility to persuade the private sector to invest. That may not matter on a simple job such as building a road, where requirements are unlikely to change much. But the opportunity cost grows with the complexity of the contract. Take, for instance, the public-private partnership to maintain and upgrade the London Underground, which, at £15.7 billion over 30 years, is Britain s biggest. “The tube is a very complicated system. Did we really know what we would want over the next 30 years?�asks Stephen Glaister, a professor of transport economics at Imperial College, London. He points to suggestions from the mayor that trains should run overnight on Fridays and Saturdays as an example. “It s a perfectly good idea, but the contracts don t allow for it.� The more complicated a contract is, the harder it is to write. The fuel dispenser NAO reckons that bidding costs added £455m to the cost of the tube agreements, which run to 28,000 pages. A dizzying system of fines and rewards is meant to align the interests of contractors and passengers. But unless the state can calibrate everything properly in advance (a Solomonic task), its contractors may face perverse or inadequate incentives for the life of the agreement. The tube experience provides ample warning of some of the hazards facing the military as it tries to wrap up the aerial refuelling contract. But it is unlikely to deter defence